Comments on: Document/View All Over Again… http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/ ASP.NET, HTML, CSS, Visual Studio, CSharp, VB.NET and other programming items of interest. Mon, 15 Mar 2010 11:52:22 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2 hourly 1 By: Mihail http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-371 Mihail Tue, 04 Mar 2008 22:17:20 +0000 http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/#comment-371 OK, thanks! OK, thanks!

]]> By: Dave http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-370 Dave Tue, 04 Mar 2008 19:04:49 +0000 http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/#comment-370 If you limit the question to .NET implementation. The best generic implementation is going to be a DataSet filled via a DataReader. This is basically what I'm doing with my DotNetNuke code now. Using the DataSet as my BLL layer gives me the advantage of databinding that I can't get using other methods and using the DataReader lets me fill it from any database. And, if I need to my fill code really doesn't even have to use the DataReader. I'll post something in a couple of days that shows what I'm doing in a bit more detail. If you limit the question to .NET implementation. The best generic implementation is going to be a DataSet filled via a DataReader. This is basically what I’m doing with my DotNetNuke code now. Using the DataSet as my BLL layer gives me the advantage of databinding that I can’t get using other methods and using the DataReader lets me fill it from any database. And, if I need to my fill code really doesn’t even have to use the DataReader. I’ll post something in a couple of days that shows what I’m doing in a bit more detail.

]]> By: Mihail http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-369 Mihail Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:52:27 +0000 http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/#comment-369 Clarification - I am talking about designing and implementing Generic DAL framework. Clarification – I am talking about designing and implementing Generic DAL framework.

]]> By: Mihail http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-368 Mihail Tue, 04 Mar 2008 18:12:03 +0000 http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/#comment-368 Just a bit frustrated on various takes on how to implement a DAL, that's all. Just a bit frustrated on various takes on how to implement a DAL, that’s all.

]]> By: Dave http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-367 Dave Mon, 03 Mar 2008 21:09:24 +0000 http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/#comment-367 "It seems that DAL is still anyone implementation " Uh? Maybe I'd understand the rest of your comment if I understood that sentence? “It seems that DAL is still anyone implementation ”

Uh?

Maybe I’d understand the rest of your comment if I understood that sentence?

]]> By: Mihail http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/comment-page-1/#comment-366 Mihail Mon, 03 Mar 2008 20:58:59 +0000 http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/02/21/documentview-all-over-again/#comment-366 It seems that DAL is still anyone implementation - I really hoped that LINQ would be the DAL's way. Few questions: 1. While I agree with the idea that Document/View architecture didn't work, I have the feeling that MVP is not the clear cut solution either, too much time is spend in trying to fit the pieces in the right layer, too complicated and I don't see the benefits - ease of implementation, rapid development, better way of debugging due to the layer separation, etc. 2. CAB comes in my mind as a developing model, just wonder what are your thoughts about CAB, if any. Thanks. It seems that DAL is still anyone implementation – I really hoped that LINQ would be the DAL’s way. Few questions:
1. While I agree with the idea that Document/View architecture didn’t work, I have the feeling that MVP is not the clear cut solution either, too much time is spend in trying to fit the pieces in the right layer, too complicated and I don’t see the benefits – ease of implementation, rapid development, better way of debugging due to the layer separation, etc.
2. CAB comes in my mind as a developing model, just wonder what are your thoughts about CAB, if any.
Thanks.

]]>