<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Secret to Debugging . . .</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/05/06/the-secret-to-debugging/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/05/06/the-secret-to-debugging/</link>
	<description>ASP.NET, HTML, CSS, Visual Studio, CSharp, VB.NET and other programming items of interest.</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 22:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: ramil</title>
		<link>http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/05/06/the-secret-to-debugging/#comment-477</link>
		<dc:creator>ramil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 May 2008 07:08:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/05/06/the-secret-to-debugging/#comment-477</guid>
		<description>I agree with you as well, Dave.  :)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with you as well, Dave.  <img src='http://blog.dmbcllc.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: steve ruddell</title>
		<link>http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/05/06/the-secret-to-debugging/#comment-476</link>
		<dc:creator>steve ruddell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 16:48:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.dmbcllc.com/2008/05/06/the-secret-to-debugging/#comment-476</guid>
		<description>i have found this to be true too, especially when i've been at it for a few hours; that's usually when i'm too narrowly focused and am blind to those assumptions.

stepping away for a bit helps, but like you said, what needs to be done is to patiently observe, often step-by-step, what is *actually* happening.  that usually helps reveal that what i assumed was happening, was not.

i'd add that this is especially true if working by oneself.  if i can get someone else to look at it, they essentially will do the same thing, just not assume what i have been taking for granted all along. i've also found in those conversations that as i describe what it should do, to someone who is fresh to the problem, and walk through the code with them .. that sometimes that brings those assumptions to light too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i have found this to be true too, especially when i&#8217;ve been at it for a few hours; that&#8217;s usually when i&#8217;m too narrowly focused and am blind to those assumptions.</p>
<p>stepping away for a bit helps, but like you said, what needs to be done is to patiently observe, often step-by-step, what is *actually* happening.  that usually helps reveal that what i assumed was happening, was not.</p>
<p>i&#8217;d add that this is especially true if working by oneself.  if i can get someone else to look at it, they essentially will do the same thing, just not assume what i have been taking for granted all along. i&#8217;ve also found in those conversations that as i describe what it should do, to someone who is fresh to the problem, and walk through the code with them .. that sometimes that brings those assumptions to light too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
