Advanced CSharp – yield
Have you ever had a situation arise where you want to create a function that returns a collection of results and you want the results to be listed in a for each loop?
Sure you have. And I bet I know what your code looked like too:
public ArrayList CollectionFunction() { ArrayList ar = new ArrayList(); for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { ar.Add(i * (i + 1)); } return ar; } public void CollectionEach() { foreach (object o in CollectionFunction()) Console.Write(o.ToString()); }
But did you know there is a much easier way to write this code and, as it turns out, it’s much more efficient too.
Instead of creating an array in the CollectionFunction() we can have CSharp take care of all the details by using the yield statement in our loop and making our CollectionFunction return IEnumerable instead of the ArrayList.
Here is the modified code:
public IEnumerable CollectionFunction() { for (int i = 0; i < 10; i++) { yield return (i * (i + 1)); } } public void CollectionEach() { foreach (int i in CollectionFunction()) Console.Write(i.ToString()); }
What happens under the hood is that a class is created to implement the behavior we’ve described in the code, meaning that the computation actually occurs AS we are looping through the IEnumerable object rather than building up a list, returning it, and then looping through the results.
Other post in Advanced CSharp
- Two Interfaces. Same Method. Two meanings. - September 29th, 2008
- Making values nullable - October 9th, 2008
- CSharp's Property Shortcuts - October 23rd, 2008
- Readonly variables in CSharp? Really?! - October 29th, 2008
- Dispose with Using - November 10th, 2008
- Delegates in .NET - December 4th, 2008
- Using Sealed in CSharp - December 8th, 2008
- CSharp checked and unchecked - December 11th, 2008
- Advanced CSharp - unsafe mode - December 15th, 2008
- Volatile variables and CSharp threads - December 22nd, 2008
- What is the global keyword in CSharp? - December 29th, 2008
- CSharp fixed keyword - January 5th, 2009
- using - There's more there than you are using - February 2nd, 2009
- Stackalloc in CSharp - February 16th, 2009
- Removing Warnings from CSharp Compile Cycle - March 10th, 2009
- && vs & and | vs ||... What's the difference? - March 16th, 2009
- Advanced CSharp - yield - March 25th, 2009
- Just say “No!” to C# Regions? Really?! - April 16th, 2009
- C# “” better than string.Empty? - April 20th, 2009
- .Net String Pool – Not Just For The Compiler - April 22nd, 2009
- CSharp ?? Operator - May 18th, 2009
- Using VB.NET From CSharp - July 1st, 2009
- Dispose, Finalize and SuppressFinalize - July 9th, 2009
- What is .NET’s Object.GetHashCode() Used For? - August 5th, 2009
- ASP.NET Substitution Control - October 22nd, 2009
Other Related Items:
Illustrated C# 2008 (Windows.Net)The unique, visual format of Illustrated C# 2008 has been specially created by author, and teacher of development methods, Daniel Solis. The concis... Read More >
Bodum Pavina Double Wall Thermal Glass CollectionWith futuristic looks and high-tech construction, Bodum's Pavina drinkware makes an exciting departure from traditional glassmaking. Each vessel is cr... Read More >
If you're new here, you may want to subscribe to the mailing list to get notifications of new post and a virtual tour of past topics. Thanks for visiting!










I stumbled upon the yield statement a while ago – absolutely love it and I even considered asking you to write it up.
But there is an issue with type safety if you are not using System.Collections.Generic. The foreach loop would still compile if written this way:
foreach (DirectoryInfo i in CollectionFunction())
Using generics would force you to define IEnumerable:
public IEnumerable CollectionFunction()
You would then be prevented from returning or receiving anything other than an int.
Thank you for a great blog!
Rick
Hmm – looks like the lt and gt were stripped from my code. Amendment:
public IEnumerable<int> CollectionFunction()