Recent Posts
Calendar
May 2013
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031  

Archive for the ‘Advanced VB.NET’ Category

VB.NET Processing Before WinForm Display

arct-075

I woke up this morning to an interesting question.

“Using VB.net 2008, I want my project to be a Windows Forms Application, but upon startup, I want to check a few files to see if they exist and if they don’t I do not want the startup form to load. I just want the program to quit. If you have to start this type of application with a form, how do you keep the form from displaying?”

Read the rest of this entry »

VB.NET Nullable Value Types

tp_vol4_001

SQL has long had the ability to specify that a value is NULL even if it is a primitive type, but the only way you could have a NULL value in VB.NET is if you were dealing with an object.

That is, until .NET 2.0

Even though .NET 2.0 has been out for a while, I would bet that few VB.NET programmers know about this new feature because it is one of those things most of us have grown to assume is not possible.

Values must have content–objects don’t.  That’s just the way it is.

Read the rest of this entry »

Manually Adding Event Handlers in VB.NET

office-019

Typically when we write our code, the event handlers get wired up for us using the handles clause.  So we never have to worry about wiring up our event handlers manually.

But what about the case where we want to dynamically add a control to our Windows Form or our ASP.NET page?  For example, add a button.  How would you respond to the button click event?

Read the rest of this entry »

VB.NET Hide Module Name

misc_vol3_064 Here’s a quick tip for those of you still using modules in your VB.NET applications.

If you create a module and don’t want to see the module name in your intellisense, you can hide it with an attribute.  This can be extremely useful when you have a lot of modules that would show up in your intellisense code and they don’t have names that conflict with each other.

Read the rest of this entry »

.Net String Pool – Not Just For The Compiler

B03B0055 On Monday, I was corrected in my assertion that creating multiple empty strings would create multiple objects.  Turns out the compiler automatically puts all of the strings that are exactly the same in a “string pool” so that there is only ever one empty string in the entire application you’ve created.

Duh! I should have known this, or at least I should have expected that this was so since it has been true with every other compiled language I’ve worked with.

But what I didn’t know and couldn’t expect is that we can make use of this string pool programmatically as well.

Read the rest of this entry »

Bear