Home » 2016 » May

3 Reasons You Believe 100% Code Coverage Is Impossible

I’ve written about Test Driven Development before.  I’ve even written about 100% code coverage before.  And I haven’t written much about it recently because I’ve been focused on JavaScript.  But, I’ve been thinking about the 100% code coverage debate more and I have a few more thoughts on the subject.

You see, the more I practice Test Driven Development, the more inclined I am to believe that there are only three reasons for arguing against 100% code coverage.

100% Code Coverage

Continue reading “3 Reasons You Believe 100% Code Coverage Is Impossible”

JavaScript Prototypal Inheritance

Over the last several months we’ve looked at several different aspects of how JavaScript deals with objects.  A few weeks ago, we looked at JavaScript Types and noted that many of the types are actually objects, while not all are.  We’ve also looked at JavaScript Objects and JavaScript Object Fields.  This has all been foundational information you need to understand prior to understanding how JavaScript Prototypal Inheritance.

JavaScript Prototypal Inheritance

Continue reading “JavaScript Prototypal Inheritance”

Are You Average or Awesome? 9 Ways to Improve.

The story goes that there were two men, Joe and Frank, who were camping out in the woods when a bear showed up in the camp.  Terrified, they decided the best they could do would be to stay perfectly still until the bear left.  Hopefully, the bear wouldn’t notice them.  As the bear was poking around, Joe says to Frank, “What are we going to do if this doesn’t work?”  Frank says, “Run!”  Joe says, “You really think we can out run a bear?”  Frank says, “I don’t need to out run the bear.  I only need to out run you.”

9 Ways to Improve
Photo credit: Internet Archive Book Images via VisualHunt.com / No known copyright restrictions

Continue reading “Are You Average or Awesome? 9 Ways to Improve.”

ES2015 Code Coverage and Jest (React JS Unit Testing)

As I’ve mentioned before, I’m in the middle of putting together a React reference app and I’m doing it using Test Driven Development.  The problem is, the standard tools for implementing ES2015 code coverage with Jest make it hard to see at a glance if you have 100% code coverage or not because of some issues with the way Jest tells Babel to do the transformations by default, the way Babel transforms the code and implements the auxiliaryCommentBefore option and the way that Istanbul parses the ignore next comments.

I’ve been working on solving this problem for the last month and a half off and on.  I’ve even posted a question about this on Stack Overflow, so I’m pretty sure no one else has a solution for this yet.  I’m not going to say my solution is the best way to solve this problem, but it is a solution, which is better than what we have so far.

ES2015 Code Coverage and Jest

Continue reading “ES2015 Code Coverage and Jest (React JS Unit Testing)”